Câu hỏi: Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the
correct answer to each of the questions from 35 to 42.
According to sociologists, there are several different ways in which a person may become recognized as the leader of a social group in the United States. In the family, traditional cultural patterns confer leadership on one or both of the parents. In other cases, such as friendship groups, one or more persons may gradually emerge as leaders, although there is no formal process of selection. In larger groups, leaders are usually chosen formally through election or recruitment.
Although leaders are often thought to be people with unusual personal ability, decades of research have failed to produce consistent evidence that there is any category of "natural leaders". It seems that there is no set of personal qualities that all leaders have in common; rather, virtually any person may be recognized as a leader if the person has qualities that meet the needs of that particular group.
Furthermore, although it is commonly supposed that social groups have a single leader, research suggests that there are typically two different leadership roles that are held by different individuals. Instrumental leadership is leadership that emphasizes the completion of tasks by a social group. Group members look to instrumental leaders to "get things" done." Expressive leadership, on the other hand, is leadership that emphasizes the collective well-being of a social group's member. Expressive leaders are less concerned with the overall goals of the group than with providing emotional support to group members and attempting to minimize tension and conflict among them. Group members expect expressive leaders to maintain stable relationships within the group and provide support to individual members.
Instrumental leaders are likely to have a rather secondary relationship to other group members. They give orders and may discipline group members who inhibit attainment of the group's goals. Expressive leaders cultivate a more personal or primary relationship to others in the group. They offer sympathy when someone experiences difficulties or is subjected to discipline, are quick to lighten a serious moment with humor, and try to resolve issues that threaten to divide the group.
As the differences in these two roles suggest, expressive leaders generally receive more personal affection from group members; instrumental leaders, if they are successful in promoting group goals, may enjoy a more distant respect.
In mentioning "natural leaders" in the second paragraph, the author is making the point that __________.
A. few people qualify as "natural leaders"
B. there is no proof that "natural leaders" exist
C. "natural leaders' are easily accepted by the members of a social group
D. "natural leaders" share a similar set of characteristics
correct answer to each of the questions from 35 to 42.
According to sociologists, there are several different ways in which a person may become recognized as the leader of a social group in the United States. In the family, traditional cultural patterns confer leadership on one or both of the parents. In other cases, such as friendship groups, one or more persons may gradually emerge as leaders, although there is no formal process of selection. In larger groups, leaders are usually chosen formally through election or recruitment.
Although leaders are often thought to be people with unusual personal ability, decades of research have failed to produce consistent evidence that there is any category of "natural leaders". It seems that there is no set of personal qualities that all leaders have in common; rather, virtually any person may be recognized as a leader if the person has qualities that meet the needs of that particular group.
Furthermore, although it is commonly supposed that social groups have a single leader, research suggests that there are typically two different leadership roles that are held by different individuals. Instrumental leadership is leadership that emphasizes the completion of tasks by a social group. Group members look to instrumental leaders to "get things" done." Expressive leadership, on the other hand, is leadership that emphasizes the collective well-being of a social group's member. Expressive leaders are less concerned with the overall goals of the group than with providing emotional support to group members and attempting to minimize tension and conflict among them. Group members expect expressive leaders to maintain stable relationships within the group and provide support to individual members.
Instrumental leaders are likely to have a rather secondary relationship to other group members. They give orders and may discipline group members who inhibit attainment of the group's goals. Expressive leaders cultivate a more personal or primary relationship to others in the group. They offer sympathy when someone experiences difficulties or is subjected to discipline, are quick to lighten a serious moment with humor, and try to resolve issues that threaten to divide the group.
As the differences in these two roles suggest, expressive leaders generally receive more personal affection from group members; instrumental leaders, if they are successful in promoting group goals, may enjoy a more distant respect.
In mentioning "natural leaders" in the second paragraph, the author is making the point that __________.
A. few people qualify as "natural leaders"
B. there is no proof that "natural leaders" exist
C. "natural leaders' are easily accepted by the members of a social group
D. "natural leaders" share a similar set of characteristics
Khi đề cập đến "các nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" trong đoạn 2 thì ý của tác giả là ____________.
A. rất ít người có đủ khả năng là "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm"
B. không có bằng chứng về việc "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" tồn tại
C. "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" dễ dàng được chấp nhận bởi các thành viên trong một nhóm xã hội
D. "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" có chung nhiều đặc điểm
Dẫn chứng: Although leaders are often thought to be people with unusual personal ability, decades of research have failed to produce consistent evidence that there is any category of "natural leaders."(Mặc dù các nhà lãnh đạo thường được cho là những người có khả năng đặc biệt nhưng các nghiên cứu trong nhiều thập kỉ qua đã không tìm ra bằng chứng phù hợp cho việc có "các nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" hay không.)
A. rất ít người có đủ khả năng là "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm"
B. không có bằng chứng về việc "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" tồn tại
C. "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" dễ dàng được chấp nhận bởi các thành viên trong một nhóm xã hội
D. "nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" có chung nhiều đặc điểm
Dẫn chứng: Although leaders are often thought to be people with unusual personal ability, decades of research have failed to produce consistent evidence that there is any category of "natural leaders."(Mặc dù các nhà lãnh đạo thường được cho là những người có khả năng đặc biệt nhưng các nghiên cứu trong nhiều thập kỉ qua đã không tìm ra bằng chứng phù hợp cho việc có "các nhà lãnh đạo thiên bẩm" hay không.)
Đáp án B.