Google
Câu hỏi: Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.
Love stories often include people finding partners who seem to have traits that they lack, like a good girl falling for a bad boy. In this way, they appear to complement one another. For example, one spouse might be outgoing and funny while the other is shy and serious. It's easy to see how both partners could view the other as ideal – one partner's strengths balancing out the other partner's weaknesses.
The question is whether people actually seek out complementary partners or if that just happens in the movies…There is essentially no research evidence that differences in personality, interests, education, politics, upbringing, religion or other traits lead to greater attraction. For example, in one study researchers found that college students preferred descriptions of mates whose written bios were similar to themselves or their ideal self over those described as complementing themselves.
Despite the overwhelming evidence, why does the myth of heterogamy endure? There's evidence that small differences between spouses can become larger over time. In their self-help book "Reconcilable Differences," psychologists Andrew Christensen, Brian Doss and Neil Jacobson describe how partners move into roles that are complementary over time. For example, if one member of a couple is slightly more humorous than the other, the couple may settle into a pattern in which the slightly-more-funny spouse claims the role of "the funny one" while the slightly-less-funny spouse slots into the role of "the serious one."
In the end, people's attraction to differences is vastly outweighed by our attraction to similarities. People persist in thinking opposites attract – when in reality, relatively similar partners just become a bit more complementary as time goes by.
(Source: https://theconversation.com/)
According to paragraph 2, what is the answer concerning the validity of "opposites attract"
A. It turns out to be pure fiction.
B. There are many documented cases.
C. The possibility cannot be denied.
D. It is a scientifically proven fact.
Love stories often include people finding partners who seem to have traits that they lack, like a good girl falling for a bad boy. In this way, they appear to complement one another. For example, one spouse might be outgoing and funny while the other is shy and serious. It's easy to see how both partners could view the other as ideal – one partner's strengths balancing out the other partner's weaknesses.
The question is whether people actually seek out complementary partners or if that just happens in the movies…There is essentially no research evidence that differences in personality, interests, education, politics, upbringing, religion or other traits lead to greater attraction. For example, in one study researchers found that college students preferred descriptions of mates whose written bios were similar to themselves or their ideal self over those described as complementing themselves.
Despite the overwhelming evidence, why does the myth of heterogamy endure? There's evidence that small differences between spouses can become larger over time. In their self-help book "Reconcilable Differences," psychologists Andrew Christensen, Brian Doss and Neil Jacobson describe how partners move into roles that are complementary over time. For example, if one member of a couple is slightly more humorous than the other, the couple may settle into a pattern in which the slightly-more-funny spouse claims the role of "the funny one" while the slightly-less-funny spouse slots into the role of "the serious one."
In the end, people's attraction to differences is vastly outweighed by our attraction to similarities. People persist in thinking opposites attract – when in reality, relatively similar partners just become a bit more complementary as time goes by.
(Source: https://theconversation.com/)
According to paragraph 2, what is the answer concerning the validity of "opposites attract"
A. It turns out to be pure fiction.
B. There are many documented cases.
C. The possibility cannot be denied.
D. It is a scientifically proven fact.
Theo đoạn 2, câu trả lời liên quan đến giá trị của "nam châm trái cực thì hút nhau" là gì?
A. Hóa ra là tiểu thuyết thuần túy
B. Có nhiều trường hợp được ghi nhận
C. Khả năng không thể phủ nhận
D. Đó là một thực tế đã được khoa học chứng minh
Căn cứ vào thông tin đoạn hai:
The question is whether people actually seek out complementary partners or if that just happens in the movies … There is essentially no research evidence that differences in personality, interests, education, politics, upbringing, religion or other traits lead to greater attraction.
(Câu hỏi là liệu mọi người có thực sự tìm kiếm các bạn đời bổ sung hay điều đó chỉ xảy ra trong phim … Về cơ bản không có bằng chứng nghiên cứu nào cho thấy sự khác biệt về tính cách, sở thích, giáo dục, chính trị, giáo dục, tôn giáo hoặc các đặc điểm khác dẫn đến sự thu hút lớn hơn.)
A. Hóa ra là tiểu thuyết thuần túy
B. Có nhiều trường hợp được ghi nhận
C. Khả năng không thể phủ nhận
D. Đó là một thực tế đã được khoa học chứng minh
Căn cứ vào thông tin đoạn hai:
The question is whether people actually seek out complementary partners or if that just happens in the movies … There is essentially no research evidence that differences in personality, interests, education, politics, upbringing, religion or other traits lead to greater attraction.
(Câu hỏi là liệu mọi người có thực sự tìm kiếm các bạn đời bổ sung hay điều đó chỉ xảy ra trong phim … Về cơ bản không có bằng chứng nghiên cứu nào cho thấy sự khác biệt về tính cách, sở thích, giáo dục, chính trị, giáo dục, tôn giáo hoặc các đặc điểm khác dẫn đến sự thu hút lớn hơn.)
Đáp án A.